A Qualitative Study of the Role of Pre-understanding in Learning Based on Gadamer’s Approach
Keywords:
Pre-understanding, Learning, Philosophical Hermeneutics, Hans-Georg Gadamer, Prejudice, Fusion of Horizons, Meaningful Learning, Interpretive UnderstandingAbstract
The purpose of this study was to explain the role of pre-understanding in the learning process based on Hans-Georg Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics and to examine how pre-understanding, prejudice, and the fusion of horizons contribute to meaningful learning. This study employed a qualitative design grounded in philosophical hermeneutics. Participants included 18 faculty members and doctoral students in philosophy, philosophy of education, and educational sciences from universities in Tehran, selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through semi-structured in-depth interviews and analysis of relevant hermeneutic texts and documents. Data analysis was conducted using interpretive thematic analysis guided by the principles of the hermeneutic circle. To enhance trustworthiness, participant validation, peer review, and constant comparative analysis were applied throughout the research process. The analysis resulted in three major themes: “the place of pre-understanding in the existential structure of learning,” “the role of prejudice in critical learning,” and “the fusion of horizons as meaningful learning.” Findings indicated that learners never enter the learning process without prior mental, cultural, and historical backgrounds, and that pre-understanding functions as the starting point of all understanding. The results further demonstrated that prejudices are not obstacles to knowledge but conditions that make understanding possible. Critical learning occurs when individuals consciously reflect upon and reassess their assumptions. Moreover, meaningful learning emerges through the interaction between existing horizons of meaning and new experiences, whereby dialogue, questioning, and engagement with alternative perspectives facilitate the expansion of understanding. The findings revealed that learning, from a Gadamerian perspective, is an interpretive, historical, and dialogical process in which pre-understanding, prejudice, and the fusion of horizons play fundamental roles. Pre-understanding is not a barrier to learning but the foundational condition of understanding. Deep learning occurs when learners reconstruct and expand their horizons of meaning through engagement with new perspectives. Therefore, recognizing the role of pre-understanding provides a valuable theoretical foundation for designing educational approaches centered on dialogue, reflection, and meaningful learning.
Downloads
References
Albrecht, L. P., & Albrecht, A. J. P. (2024). Gadamerian Philosophical Hermeneutics and the Laudanian Perspective of Research Traditions in Agronomy. Aoristo - International Journal of Phenomenology Hermeneutics and Metaphysics, 7(1), 99-115. https://doi.org/10.48075/aoristo.v7i1.32325
Alhazmi, A. A., & Kaufmann, A. (2022). Phenomenological Qualitative Methods Applied to the Analysis of Cross-Cultural Experience in Novel Educational Social Contexts. Frontiers in psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.785134
Ames, R. T. (2023). ‘Zoetology’: A New Name for an Old Way of Thinking. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 93, 81-98. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1358246123000012
Corcoran, L., & Cook, K. (2022). The Philosophy of Hans‐Georg Gadamer: An Exemplar of the Complicated Relationship Between Philosophy and Nursing Practice. Nursing Inquiry, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12509
Dickman, N. E. (2021). Hermeneutic Priority of Which Question? Informal logic, 41(3), 485-508. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v41i3.6840
Eller, D. W. (2023). New Horizons for the Individual Research Consultation: Critical Hermeneutics and Habermas’ Goal of Intersubjective Agreement. Interactions Ucla Journal of Education and Information Studies, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.5070/d418159162
Esterson, R. K. (2021). Judge Not? The Pedagogical Puzzle of Right Interpretation and Wrong Interpretation. Teaching Theology & Religion, 24(1), 49-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/teth.12573
Hutchinson, B. (2022). Comparativism or What We Talk About When We Talk About Comparing. Journal of Foreign Languages and Cultures, 6(1), 015-025. https://doi.org/10.53397/hunnu.jflc.202201002
Lambek, S. (2024). The Constitutive Power of Public Debate. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 57(1), 156-173. https://doi.org/10.1017/s000842392300077x
Landström, K. (2022). On Hermeneutical Openness and Wilful Hermeneutical Ignorance. Labyrinth, 24(1), 113-134. https://doi.org/10.25180/lj.v24i1.284
Latumahina, D. E., & Sudarmanto, G. (2024). Hans Georg Gadamer's Hermeneutics vs Biblical Hermeneutics: A Comparative Analysis. Manna Rafflesia, 10(2), 322-338. https://doi.org/10.38091/man_raf.v10i2.389
Mattingly, C. (2022). Crisis, Alterity, and Tradition: An Anthropological Contribution to Critical Phenomenology. Puncta, 5(2), 45-66. https://doi.org/10.5399/pjcp.v5i2.4
Mattingly, C. (2024). Identity Perplexity, Stigma, and Social Critique: Critical Phenomenology With an Errant Twist. Anthropological Theory, 25(3), 338-364. https://doi.org/10.1177/14634996241292395
McWhorter, M. R. (2021). Gadamer’s Philosophical Hermeneutics and the Formation of Mental Health Professionals. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 41(3), 187-207. https://doi.org/10.1037/teo0000169
Nikolaidis, A. C. (2021). Toward a Theory of Interpretation in Dewey's Educational Philosophy. Educational Theory, 71(6), 787-807. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12508
Palmér, L., Nyström, M., Ekeberg, M., Lindberg, E., & Karlsson, K. (2022). Pre-Understanding—A Threat to Validity in Qualitative Caring Science Research? International Journal for Human Caring, 26(4), 254-262. https://doi.org/10.20467/ijhc-2021-0013
Pertierra, I. X. L. (2021). On Gadamerian Hermeneutics: Fusions of Horizons, Dialogue, and Evolution(s) Within Culture as Dynamic System of Meaning. Eidos a Journal for Philosophy of Culture, 4(4), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.14394/eidos.jpc.2020.0040
Piecychna, B. (2021). “Understanding as Translation”: The Gadamerian Legacy in George Steiner’s Philosophy of Internal Translation. Yearbook of Translational Hermeneutics(1). https://doi.org/10.52116/yth.vi1.21
Pitcho‐Prelorentzos, S., Leshem, E., & Mahat‐Shamir, M. (2022). A Trisonance: Identities of Women Whose Mothers Were Murdered by Their Fathers. Violence Against Women, 29(5), 901-924. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012221092478
Ray, M. A., & Locsin, R. C. (2023). Toward an Adequate Understanding of Phenomenological and hermeneutic‐phenomenological Nursing Research. Nursing and Health Sciences, 25(1), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.13015
Sigurðsson, G. (2023). Commensurability and Difference. Asian Studies, 11(1), 317-333. https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2023.11.1.317-333
Song, J. Y. (2023). Would Jesus Build a Pyramid? Servant-Leadership and Corporate Social Responsibility. International Journal of Servant-Leadership, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.33972/ijsl.382
Stowell, F. (2021). The Appreciative Inquiry Method: From Knowledge Elicitation to Organisational Inquiry. Behavioral Science, 39(4), 765-775. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2806
Trettin, B., Agerskov, H., Lehmkuhl, L., Rothmann, M. J., Jensen, C. M., & Nielsen, C. (2025). Workshops as a Research Method in Health Science: Epistemological and Methodological Perspectives. Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.17050
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 1404 معصومه بیات (نویسنده مسئول)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.